Questions like this are always to test your understanding of BODMAS rule (Bracket, Order, Division, Multiplication, Addition, Substraction). If you don't follow the BODMAS rule, you will arrive at the wrong answer.
Bracket: we don't have any bracket
Order: we don't have any order
Division: we have 8 ÷ 4 = 2 so our equation becomes 8 - 2 x 3
Multiplication: we now have 2 x 3 = 6 so our equation becomes 8 - 6 = 2
Questions like this are always to test your understanding of BODMAS rule (Bracket, Order, Division, Multiplication, Addition, Substraction). If you don't follow the BODMAS rule, you will arrive at the wrong answer.
Bracket: we don't have any bracket
Order: we don't have any order
Division: we have 8 ÷ 4 = 2 so our equation becomes 8 - 2 x 3
Multiplication: we now have 2 x 3 = 6 so our equation becomes 8 - 6 = 2
Answer: 2
BY Riddles Repository - Answers
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283
Importantly, that investor viewpoint is not new. It cycles in when conditions are right (and vice versa). It also brings the ineffective warnings of an overpriced market with it.Looking toward a good 2022 stock market, there is no apparent reason to expect these issues to change.
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
